ComparisonProject Management
Ketchup vs Linear: Planned Work vs Actual Work
• 6 min read
Ketchup vs Linear: The Reality Gap
We love Linear. It is the gold standard for issue tracking. But a Jira ticket or Linear issue is a Promise. It is what you hoped to clear.
Ketchup is the Proof. It is what actually happened.
| Feature | Linear / Jira | Ketchup |
|---|---|---|
| Data Source | Human Intent (Tickets) | Machine Reality (Commits) |
| Accuracy | Low (People forget to update tickets) | 100% (Code doesn't lie) |
| Updates | Manual (Drag and drop) | Automated (Git Hooks) |
| Blind Spots | "Shadow Work" (Refactors, bug fixes) | None (Everything is tracked) |
The "Shadow Work" Problem
Developers do a lot of work that never gets a ticket.
- "Quickly fixed a typo."
- "Refactored that ugly function."
- "Updated dependencies."
In Linear, this time is invisible. To management, it looks like you did nothing. In Ketchup, this Shadow Work is visible. We calculate the "Refactor Volume" and show that you were busy improving the codebase, not just slacking off.
Closing the Loop
The best teams use both.
- Linear: Link the ticket.
- Ketchup: Auto-close the loop with a summary of the resolution.
Start Automating Your Changelogs
Stop writing updates manually. Turn your commits into cinematic videos today.
Try Ketchup for Free